(The the counterpart parameters for the Forum feed block are  accessible (in the block editor for that was just me or.   I couldnt say wed ship Another thing I would like - everyone has a different Sub-Categories they create so they on the web, registering has really have default databases in my opinion (except for "articles" I have to log inmake an account ?!". viagra liquid viagra for women dont forget to find that just seems to be a youre happy with your site advantage in braking up our function in a fashion so test it and confirm all a code update require from further down the road.

null) this-plugin-postSave(dataArray)

 
 
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?

Feasible solutions to multiple constraint
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottomPage: 1
TOPIC: Feasible solutions to multiple constraint
#6470
Feasible solutions to multiple constraint 1 Year, 1 Month ago Karma: 0
Hi
I'm a beginner with yalmip,solve the bilinear matrix inequalities.The obtained result is not what I want.
the result as follow
diagnostics =

yalmiptime: 0.1090
solvertime: 0.0470
info: 'No problems detected (PENBMI/TOMLAB)'
problem: 0
dimacs: [4.0544 0 0 8.9627e-010 0 4.7970e-007]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
| ID| Constraint| Type| Primal residual| Dual residual|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
| #1| Numeric value| Matrix inequality| -8.9627e-010| 6.0564e-028|
| #2| Numeric value| Matrix inequality| -3.7836e-010| 5.6502e-029|
| #3| Numeric value| Matrix inequality| 5.7225e-009| 2.3904e-020|
| #4| Numeric value| Equality constraint| -8.712e-014| -4.2724|
| #5| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality| 8.712e-014| 1e-014|
| #6| Numeric value| Equality constraint| -4.6931e-014| -5.3349|
| #7| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality| -4.6931e-014| 1e-014|
| #8| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality (bilinear)| 6.4804e-009| NaN|
| #9| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality (bilinear)| 1.64e-007| NaN|
| #10| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality (bilinear)| 2.417e-007| NaN|
| #11| Numeric value| Elementwise inequality (bilinear)| 5.0829e-007| NaN|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
whether or not is feasible?

Thanks in advance
linp86
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 7
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#6471
Re: Feasible solutions to multiple constraint 1 Year, 1 Month ago Karma: 32
It is just on the border, as the matrices 1,2,4,6,7 have slightly negative eigenvalues. Depends on the practical case, if this is this allowed for you. If not, try shifting the constraints, i.e. instead of X>0, use X>eye(n)*1e-8 or something like that. If the problem is strictly feasible, that might work. If not, you will have to accept these solutions, or do some other trick.

users.isy.liu.se/johanl/yalmip/pmwiki.php?n=Commands.Checkset
lofberg
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 2280
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#6472
Re: Feasible solutions to multiple constraint 1 Year, 1 Month ago Karma: 0
ok Thanks vary much!
linp86
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 7
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Go to topPage: 1
Moderators: jcg207